Development and Verification of a Comprehensive Rod Bundle CHF Mechanism Model
-
摘要: 为了实现棒束通道中宽参数范围下偏离泡核沸腾(DNB)型和干涸(DO)型临界热流密度(CHF)的连续准确预测,采用棒束通道中的CHF分类准则和气泡湍流脉动下的过热液体层蒸干DNB型CHF机理模型,结合已经研究成熟的DO型CHF机理模型,建立了覆盖不同类型CHF的综合棒束CHF机理模型。采用中国核动力研究设计院(NPIC)的5×5全长棒束CHF实验数据对所建立的综合棒束CHF机理模型进行了验证,结果表明,综合棒束CHF机理模型所有的预测值/测量值(P/M)数据均匀地分布在1附近,最大相对偏差在±22%之内,说明开发的综合棒束CHF机理模型能够实现对棒束通道DNB型和DO型CHF的连续准确预测。
-
关键词:
- 棒束通道 /
- 临界热流密度(CHF) /
- 机理模型
Abstract: In order to continuously and accurately predict departure from nucleate boiling (DNB) and dry-out (DO) type critical heat flux (CHF) under wide parameter range for rod bundle channel, a comprehensive rod bundle CHF mechanism model covering different types of CHF based on the CHF classification criterion in the bundle channel and the mechanism model of DNB type CHF for evaporation of superheated liquid layer and combined with the mature DO type CHF mechanism model that has been studied. The 5 × 5 full-length rod bundle CHF experimental data of Nuclear Power Institute of China (NPIC) is used to verify the CHF mechanism model of the comprehensive rod bundle. The results show that all predicted value/measured value (P/ M ) data of the comprehensive rod bundle CHF mechanism model are evenly distributed around 1, and the maximum relative deviation is within ± 22%, indicating that the developed comprehensive rod bundle CHF mechanism model can continuously and accurately predict the DNB and DO type CHF in rod bundle channel.-
Key words:
- Rod bundle channel /
- Critical heat flux (CHF) /
- Mechanism model
-
表 1 各组数据及其特征
Table 1. Each Group of Data and Its Characteristics
实验系列 栅元类型 轴向功率分布 格架布置类型 TEST1 典型 均匀 半跨 TEST2 典型 均匀 半跨 TEST5 典型 均匀 半跨 TEST7 导向管 均匀 全跨 TEST8 典型 均匀 全跨 -
[1] TONG L S. Heat transfer in water-cooled nuclear reactors[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1967, 6(4): 301-324. doi: 10.1016/0029-5493(67)90111-2 [2] YANG B W, HAN B, LIU A G, et al. Recent challenges in subchannel thermal-hydraulics-CFD modeling, subchannel analysis, CHF experiments, and CHF prediction[J]. Nuclear engineering and design, 2019, 354: 110236. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110236 [3] GROENEVELD D C, IRELAND A, KAIZER J, et al. An overview of measurements, data compilations and prediction methods for the critical heat flux in water-cooled tubes[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2018, 331: 211-221. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.02.031 [4] LIU Y, LIU W, SHAN J Q, et al. A mechanistic bubble crowding model for predicting critical heat flux in subchannels of a bundle[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2020, 137: 107085. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2019.107085 [5] ZHANG H B, HEWITT G F. New models of droplet deposition and entrainment for prediction of CHF in cylindrical rod bundles[J]. Nuclear engineering and design, 2016, 305: 73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.04.044 [6] LIU W, PENG S N, JIANG G M, et al. Analytical investigation on rod bundle CHF-regime criterion based on dimensionless groups[J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2021, 159: 106571. doi: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.106571 [7] LIU W, PENG S N, JIANG G M, et al. Development and assessment of a new CHF mechanistic model for subcooled and low quality flow boiling[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2021, 165: 120641. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120641 [8] LIU W, PENG S N, SHAN J Q, et al. Applicability research of round tube CHF mechanistic model in rod bundle channel[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2021, 53(2): 439-445. doi: 10.1016/j.net.2020.07.023 [9] CHANG S H, BANG I C, BAEK W P. A photographic study on the near-wall bubble behavior in subcooled flow boiling[J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2002, 41(7): 609-618. doi: 10.1016/S1290-0729(02)01354-6 [10] GROENEVELD D. The critical heat flux story[C]//The 15th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics. Pisa, Italy, 2013. [11] LIM J C, WEISMAN J. A phenomenologically based prediction of rod-bundle dryout[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1988, 105(3): 363-371. doi: 10.1016/0029-5493(88)90256-7 [12] 秦胜杰,郎雪梅,谢士杰,等. 压水堆燃料组件临界热流密度验证实验[J]. 核动力工程,2016, 37(5): 1-3.