LBB管道裂纹泄漏率计算软件PICLES验证研究

何风; 吴万军; 马若群; 房永刚; 艾红雷; 王新军; 孙英学

doi:10.13832/j.jnpe.2022.06.0168

LBB管道裂纹泄漏率计算软件PICLES验证研究

doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2022.06.0168

1.
中国核动力研究设计院核反应堆系统设计技术重点实验室，成都，610213
2.
生态环境部核与辐射安全中心，北京，100082

详细信息

作者简介:
何　风（1984—），男，高级工程师，硕士，主要从事反应堆结构力学方面的工作，E-mail: hefeng_work@163.com

中图分类号: TL353⁺.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 194
- HTML全文浏览量: 95
- PDF下载量: 25
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-11-16
- 录用日期: 2022-02-14
- 修回日期: 2022-02-01
- 刊出日期: 2022-12-14

Verification and Research of LBB Pipe Crack Leakage Rate Calculation Software PICLES

1.
Science and Technology on Reactor System Design Technology Laboratory, Nuclear Power Institute of China, Chengdu, 610213, China
2.
Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center, MEE, Beijing, 100082, China

摘要

摘要: 管道裂纹泄漏率计算是破前漏（LBB）分析中的关键技术，采用与有效软件进行对比和与实验结果进行对比的方式，对国内自主研发的泄漏率计算软件PICLES进行验证研究。与已有成熟工程应用的国际同类软件（PICEP和SI-PICEP）对比，PICLES与其计算结果相差较小；与管道裂纹泄漏率实验结果对比，PICLES计算出的泄漏率与其相差−80.23%~−43.79%，PICLES计算的泄漏裂纹长度与实测裂纹长度相差21.84%~79.07%，说明将PICLES用于过冷水管道LBB分析具有较高的保守性。因此，PICLES可用于实际工程中的LBB分析。
- LBB /
- PICLES /
- 对比验证 /
- 裂纹长度 /
- 泄漏率 /
- PICEP /
- SI-PICEP
Abstract: The calculation of pipe crack leakage rate is the key technology in leak-before-break (LBB) analysis. By comparing with the effective software and the experimental results, the domestic independently developed leakage rate calculation software PICLES is verified and studied. Compared with the international similar software (PICEP and SI-PICEP) with mature engineering applications, there is a small difference between PICLES and its calculation results. Compared with the experimental results of pipe crack leakage rate, the leakage rate calculated by PICLES is −80.23%~−43.79% different from that calculated by PICLES, and the leakage crack length calculated by PICLES is 21.84%~79.07% different from the measured crack length, which shows that the LBB analysis of supercooled water pipeline using PICLES is highly conservative. Therefore, PICLES can be used for LBB analysis in practical projects.
- LBB /
- PICLES /
- Comparative verification /
- Crack length /
- Leakage rate /
- PICEP /
- SI-PICEP

HTML全文

图 1 PICLES分析流程图

Figure 1. Analysis Flow Chart of PICLES

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 PICLES与SI-PICEP算例COD计算结果对比

x—SI-PICEP计算的COD；y—PICLES计算的COD

Figure 2. Comparison of COD Calculation Results between PICLES and SI-PICEP Calculation Examples

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 PICLES与SI-PICEP算例泄漏率计算结果对比

X—SI-PICEP计算的泄漏率；Y—PICLES计算的泄漏率

Figure 3. Comparison of Calculation Results of Leakage Rate between PICLES and SI-PICEP Calculation Examples

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 实验件裂纹处内力计算有限元模型

F—千斤顶所施加的载荷

Figure 4. Finite Element Model of Internal Force Calculation at Crack of the Experimental Piece

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 PICEP 6个算例的基本情况

Table 1. Basic Situation of 6 Calculation Examples of PICEP

编号	外径/mm	壁厚/mm	裂纹方向	裂纹类型	流体类型
算例1	114.300	8.560	轴向	晶间应力腐蚀裂纹	过冷水
算例2	19.050	1.219	轴向	晶间应力腐蚀裂纹	过冷水
算例3	711.200	31.750	环向	晶间应力腐蚀裂纹	过冷水
算例4	88.900	11.100	环向	疲劳裂纹	过冷水
算例5	860.958	47.625	环向	疲劳裂纹	过热蒸汽
算例7	306.705	16.501	环向	腐蚀裂纹	过冷水

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 PICLES与PICEP算例计算结果对比

Table 2. Comparison between the Calculation Results of PICLES and PICEP Calculation Examples

编号	COD/mm			泄漏率/(10⁻³m³·s⁻¹)
编号	PICLES	PICEP	相差百分比/%	PICLES	PICEP	相差百分比/%
算例1	0.3004	0.3302	−9.03	0.4237	0.4675	−9.37
算例2	0.0683	0.0545	25.26	0.0216	0.0188	15.09
算例3	0.0635			0.0683	0.0685	−0.20
算例4	0.5462	0.5462	0.01	3.0950	2.7780	11.41
算例5	33.0800	33.1176	−0.11	127.9000	128.3158	−0.32
算例7	0.4396	0.4259	3.21	0.8302	0.8041	3.25

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 实验结果

Table 3. Experimental Results

实验件编号	裂纹长度/mm		工况编号	温度/℃	压力/MPa	外载/N	COD/mm	质量泄漏率/(kg·h⁻¹)
实验件编号	外表面	内表面	工况编号	温度/℃	压力/MPa	外载/N	COD/mm	质量泄漏率/(kg·h⁻¹)
1	30	28	1	278.1	8.10	14448	0.068	29.521
			2	280.0	10.10	12657	0.070	35.555
			3	274.8	12.07	13838	0.095	67.653
			4	277.6	13.84	13411	0.105	86.613
			5	281.1	15.05	13288	0.119	121.170
2	50	36	1	278.0	7.85	15967	0.078	46.162
			2	277.5	10.06	14515	0.082	59.296
			3	271.0	12.07	11673	0.117	131.037
			4	276.3	13.72	10037	0.130	177.530
			5	275.4	15.00	9947	0.138	218.713
3	70	49	1	276.2	8.91	7986	0.133	193.477
			2	280.0	10.05	7896	0.144	235.258
			3	276.0	12.04	8661	0.148	294.702
			4	270.1	13.73	5090	0.151	327.362
			5	271.0	14.89	7838	0.181	646.610
外载—千斤顶所施加的载荷

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 COD和泄漏率的计算值与实验值对比

Table 4. Comparison between Calculated Values of COD and Leakage Rate and Experimental Values

实验件编号	裂纹长度/mm	工况编号	裂纹处内力		COD/mm			体积泄漏率/(10⁻⁶m³·s⁻¹)
实验件编号	裂纹长度/mm	工况编号	轴力/N	弯矩/(N·m)	计算值	实验值	相差百分比/%	计算值	实验值	相差百分比/%
1	29	1	8846.8	4946.2	0.017	0.066	−74.53	1.68	8.51	−80.23
		2	8962.1	4795.1	0.019	0.068	−72.23	2.96	10.26	−71.11
		3	8741.8	4840.6	0.021	0.092	−76.76	4.82	19.51	−75.30
		4	8854.0	4836.3	0.024	0.102	−76.40	6.10	24.98	−75.58
		5	8986.3	4872.6	0.026	0.115	−77.37	7.15	34.95	−79.53
2	43	1	8805.5	5095.6	0.027	0.067	−60.47	4.71	13.31	−64.64
		2	8822.4	4944.3	0.030	0.071	−57.26	9.61	17.10	−43.79
		3	8653.3	4572.3	0.033	0.101	−67.11	13.41	37.79	−64.52
		4	8889.4	4483.4	0.037	0.112	−67.01	16.68	51.20	−67.42
		5	8857.6	4461.7	0.040	0.119	−66.12	19.86	63.08	−68.52
3	59.5	1	8934.4	4277.6	0.038	0.113	−66.78	15.43	55.80	−72.35
		2	9077.8	4321.8	0.041	0.122	−66.49	21.02	67.86	−69.02
		3	8912.7	4342.8	0.048	0.126	−62.03	32.39	85.00	−61.89
		4	8780.3	3905.2	0.052	0.128	−59.17	39.81	94.42	−57.84
		5	8746.5	4190.9	0.058	0.154	−62.05	48.54	186.50	−73.97

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 COD和裂纹长度的计算值与实验值对比

Table 5. Comparison between Calculated Values of COD and Crack Length and Experimental Values

实验件编号	工况编号	裂纹处内力		COD/mm			裂纹长度/mm
实验件编号	工况编号	轴力/N	弯矩/(N·m)	计算值	实验值	相差百分比/%	计算值	实验值	相差百分比/%
1	1	8846.8	4946.2	0.034	0.066	−48.99	51.93	29.0	79.07
	2	8962.1	4795.1	0.032	0.068	−53.00	45.28		56.14
	3	8741.8	4840.6	0.040	0.092	−56.75	48.67		67.83
	4	8854.0	4836.3	0.045	0.102	−55.84	48.70		67.93
	5	8986.3	4872.6	0.053	0.115	−54.02	51.71		78.31
2	1	8805.5	5095.6	0.042	0.067	−37.55	61.50	43.0	43.02
	2	8822.4	4944.3	0.039	0.071	−45.24	52.39		21.84
	3	8653.3	4572.3	0.053	0.101	−47.11	61.85		43.84
	4	8889.4	4483.4	0.062	0.112	−44.64	63.49		47.65
	5	8857.6	4461.7	0.069	0.119	−42.21	63.98		48.79
3	1	8934.4	4277.6	0.070	0.113	−38.41	87.34	59.5	46.79
	2	9077.8	4321.8	0.072	0.122	−41.33	83.97		41.13
	3	8912.7	4342.8	0.076	0.126	−39.28	79.63		33.83
	4	8780.3	3905.2	0.078	0.128	−39.10	76.45		28.49
	5	8746.5	4190.9	0.105	0.154	−31.56	85.31		43.38

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(9)

[1]	周胜,张征明. 破前漏分析中泄漏率模型研究进展[J]. 原子能科学技术,2009, 43(S1): 84-91.
[2]	NORRIS D M, CHEXAL B. PICEP: pipe crack evaluation program (Revision 1): special report: EPRI-NP-3596-SR-Rev. 1[R]. Palo Alto: EPRI, 1987.
[3]	PAUL D D, AHMAD J, SCOTT P M, et al. Evaluation and refinement of leak-rate estimation models: NUREG/CR-5128[R]. Washington: Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1991.
[4]	吴万军,谢海,兰彬,等. 管道裂纹泄漏率计算软件开发[J]. 核动力工程,2015, 36(4): 65-68. doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2015.04.0065
[5]	彭常宏,郭赟,李浩,等. 管道穿透裂纹泄漏率计算程序[J]. 核动力工程,2003, 24(6): 505-507,554. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-0926.2003.06.003
[6]	U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Standard review plan 3.9. 1 special topics for mechanical components: NUREG-0800[S]. Washington: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2007.
[7]	U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Evaluation of potential for pipe breaks: NUREG-1061[S]. Washington: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1984.
[8]	U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Standard review plan 3.6. 3 Leak-before-break evaluation procedures: NUREG-0800[S]. Washington: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2007.
[9]	吴万军,黄旋,沈平川. 管道裂纹泄漏率计算方法研究[J]. 核动力工程,2015, 36(S2): 122-126. doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2015.S2.0122