压水堆堆外核仪表系统单点校刻法研究及应用

白家赫; 杨灏哲; 万承辉; 潘泽飞; 李载鹏; 李云召; 吴宏春

doi:10.13832/j.jnpe.2023.04.0025

压水堆堆外核仪表系统单点校刻法研究及应用

doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2023.04.0025

1.
西安交通大学核科学与技术系，西安，710049
2.
江苏核电有限公司，江苏连云港，222042

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（12005164）

详细信息

作者简介:
白家赫（1996—），男，博士研究生，现主要从事核反应堆物理计算方法研究，E-mail: baijh18@163.com

通讯作者:
万承辉，E-mail: wan.ch@mail.xjtu.edu.cn

中图分类号: TL329
计量
- 文章访问数: 186
- HTML全文浏览量: 52
- PDF下载量: 45
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-08-04
- 修回日期: 2022-09-21
- 刊出日期: 2023-08-15

Research and Application of Single-Point Calibration Method for Ex-core Nuclear Instrument System of PWRs

1.
Department of Nuclear Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, 710049, China
2.
Jiangsu Nuclear Power Co., Ltd., Lianyungang, Jiangsu, 222042, China

摘要

摘要: 压水堆堆外探测器用于实时指示堆芯的功率水平以及轴向功率偏差，需要定期校刻保证指示精度，一般采用多点校刻的方式，多次移动控制棒及通量图测量，极大地影响了核电厂的经济性和安全性。因此，本研究提出了堆外核仪表系统的单点校刻法，将理论计算与实测数据结合，引入轴向功率偏移修正量和堆外探测器灵敏度系数，并利用堆芯分析软件模拟控制棒移动，最后确定堆外探测器的校刻系数。基于该单点校刻法，在压水堆堆芯分析程序SPARK中完成了功能开发，并采用M310机组多循环的实测数据完成了单点校刻法在工程应用中的验证。验证结果表明，本文提出的单点校刻法具有较高的校刻精度，与实测值对比，功率水平和轴向功率偏差的误差平均值分别为0.31%和0.16%。因此，该单点校刻法能够准确确定堆外探测器校刻系数，且能节省校刻时间，无需控制棒移动，有助于提升核电厂经济性和安全性，具有工程应用及推广价值。
- 堆外探测器 /
- 单点校刻法 /
- 多点校刻法 /
- SPARK程序
Abstract: The ex-core detector is used to indicate the reactor power and axial-power difference in commercial PWRs, and it needs to be calibrated regularly to ensure the accuracy. The conventional multi-point calibration method needs to move the control rods and measure the flux-mapping several times, which influences the economy and safety of power plants. Therefore, the single-point calibration method for the ex-core nuclear instrument system has been proposed in this paper, which combines both the theoretical calculation and measurement data. The axial offset correction factor and the ex-core detector sensitivity are introduced in this method. And the core-analysis code is utilized to simulate the movement of control rods. Eventually, the calibration coefficients could be determined. Based on the single-point calibration method, the function development has been achieved in the core-analysis code SPARK, and it has been verified by the multiple cycles’ measurement data from M310 reactor. The verification results indicate that the single-point calibration method proposed in this research has higher calibration accuracy. Compared with the measured power level and axial power difference, the average biases of calibration results are 0.31% and 0.16%, repectively. Therefore, the single-point calibration method is capable to determine the calibration coefficients accurately, and save calibration time without control rod movement. This method could improve the economy and safety of power plants and has the engineering application and popularization value.
- Ex-core detector /
- Single-point calibration method /
- Multi-point calibration method /
- SPARK code

HTML全文

图 1 堆外探测器径向布置

Figure 1. Radial Configuration of Ex-core Detectors

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 堆外探测器轴向布置

Figure 2. Axial Configuration of Ex-core Detectors

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 C01循环BOL附近校刻结果

Figure 3. Calibration Results near BOL of C01 Cycle

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 C01循环MOL附近校刻结果

Figure 4. Calibration Results near MOL of C01 Cycle

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 C01循环EOL附近校刻结果

Figure 5. Calibration Results near EOL of C01 Cycle

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 C02循环BOL附近校刻结果

Figure 6. Calibration Results near BOL of C02 Cycle

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 C02循环MOL附近校刻结果

Figure 7. Calibration Results near MOL of C02 Cycle

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 功率水平误差统计结果

Figure 8. Statistic Results of Power Level

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 轴向功率偏差的误差统计结果

Figure 9. Statistic Results of Axial Power Difference

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(13)

[1]	竹生东,邓力,李树,等. 堆外核仪表系统(RPN)的预设效验系数理论计算[J]. 核动力工程,2004, 25(2): 152-155.
[2]	王银丽,张芸,罗炜,等. 华龙一号核仪表系统定期试验方案设计[J]. 上海交通大学学报,2018, 52(S1): 53-57. doi: 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2018.S1.011
[3]	任意. 三代压水堆堆外核测仪表调试方案研究与设计[J]. 自动化仪表,2021, 42(S1): 237-241.
[4]	谭兴春,何子帅,黄灿,等. 数字化控制模式下RPN功率量程的调校和优化[J]. 产业与科技论坛,2020, 19(24): 42-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5641.2020.24.021
[5]	郭远熊, 彭松, 易林, 等. 压水堆核电厂“一点法”校准堆外核测量系统的研究分析和应用[C]//CORPHY2018——第十七届反应堆数值计算和粒子输运学术会议暨2018年反应堆物理会议. 深圳, 2018.
[6]	张洪. 一种标定核反应堆堆外探测器的方法及装置: 中国, 201910965801.4[P]. 2020-02-04.
[7]	李文淮, 张香菊, 党珍, 等. 一种标定核反应堆堆外探测器的方法: 中国, 201510328694.6[P]. 2015-10-28.
[8]	蒋校丰, 张少泓, 胡娟, 等. 一种利用单次堆内通量测量完成堆外探测器刻度的方法: 中国, 201710897802.0[P]. 2017-12-19.
[9]	孟凡锋, 胡娟, 蒋校丰, 等. 一种核电厂堆外核测量系统计算系数校准的方法: 中国, 201711021595.9[P]. 2018-03-30.
[10]	蔡云, 肖鹏, 刘同先, 等. 获取堆外探测器刻度系数的方法、系统、装置及存储介质: 中国, 202111192021.4[P]. 2022-01-14.
[11]	LI W H, WANG C. The development of HOLLY code and single-point ex-core detectors calibration method[M]//JIANG H. Proceedings of the 20th Pacific Basin Nuclear Conference. Singapore: Springer, 2017: 237-246.
[12]	万承辉,李云召,郑友琦,等. 压水堆燃料管理软件Bamboo-C研发及工业确认[J]. 核动力工程,2021, 42(5): 15-22.
[13]	XU L F, SHEN H Y, WEI J X, et al. Study of the PWR ex-core detector response simulation based on the 3D S_N method[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2020, 139: 107223. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2019.107223