压水堆三维全堆芯Pin-by-pin瞬态分析

秦浚玮; 李云召; 王昆鹏; 吴宏春; 曹良志

doi:10.13832/j.jnpe.2023.06.0032

压水堆三维全堆芯Pin-by-pin瞬态分析

doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2023.06.0032

1.
西安交通大学，西安，710049
2.
生态环境部核与辐射安全中心，北京，100082

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（11975181）

详细信息

作者简介:
秦浚玮（1998—），男，博士研究生，现主要从事压水堆瞬态分析方面的研究，E-mail: qinjunwei@stu.xjtu.edu.cn

通讯作者:
李云召，E-mail: yunzhao@xjtu.edu.cn

中图分类号: TL32
计量
- 文章访问数: 168
- HTML全文浏览量: 31
- PDF下载量: 36
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-12-13
- 修回日期: 2023-05-22
- 网络出版日期: 2023-12-11
- 刊出日期: 2023-12-15

Three-Dimensional Pin-by-pin Transient Analysis for PWR-Core

1.
Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, 710049, China
2.
Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center, Beijing, 100082, China

摘要

摘要: 为了保证核反应堆在瞬态过程中的安全性，需要进行三维全堆芯的瞬态分析，给出安全分析关注的燃料棒功率分布。本研究建立了压水堆三维全堆芯Pin-by-pin核热耦合瞬态分析的理论模型：采用全隐式向后差分方法和指数函数展开节块法实现了三维全堆芯Pin-by-pin时空中子动力学计算；采用栅元尺度的多通道模型进行三维全堆芯Pin-by-pin热工反馈计算；采用Picard迭代实现了核热紧耦合迭代计算；利用信息传递接口（MPI）并行技术，采用统一的空间区域分解方式，实现了核热耦合瞬态过程的并行计算。基于理论模型，开发了相应的程序Bamboo-Transient2.0，采用基准题和多组件问题对程序进行验证，并将其应用于商用压水堆瞬态分析。结果表明：Pin-by-pin瞬态分析程序较之组件均匀化的粗网扩散程序结果更加精细，有效改善了棒功率分布的偏差，同时能够给出栅元尺度下的各状态参数分布情况，可直接满足安全分析需求。
- 压水堆 /
- NECP-Bamboo /
- Pin-by-pin /
- 瞬态分析
Abstract: In order to ensure the safety of nuclear reactor in transient process, it is necessary to carry out three-dimensional transient analysis of the whole core to obtain the power distribution of fuel rods concerned in the safety analysis. In this paper, a theoretical model of the pin-by-pin neutronic-thermohydraulic coupling transient analysis for PWR-core is established: the three-dimensional pin-by-pin spatio-temporal neutron dynamics calculation of PWR-core is realized by fully implicit backward difference method and exponential function expansion nodal method; the multi-channel model of cell scale is used to calculate the thermal feedback of three-dimensional full core pin-by-pin; the Picard iteration is used to realize the iterative calculation of neutronic-thermohydraulic tight coupling; using the parallel technology of message passing interface (MPI) and the unified spatial domain decomposition method, the parallel calculation of neutronic-thermohydraulic coupling transient process is realized. Based on the theoretical model, the corresponding code called Bamboo-Transient 2.0 was developed and verified by the benchmark and multi-assemblies questions, and it was then applied to the transient analysis for commercial PWRs. The results show that the pin-by-pin transient analysis code has more fine results than that of the traditional coarse-mesh diffusion code based on assembly homogenization, and it can reduce the deviation of power distribution of pin-cell. Meanwhile, it can provide the distribution of state parameters at cell scale, which can directly meet the requirements of safety analysis.
- PWR /
- NECP-Bamboo /
- Pin-by-pin /
- Transient analysis

HTML全文

图 1 不同物理场网格划分方式

Figure 1. Meshing Methods for Different Physical Fields

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 物理场、热场和流场转换关系

Figure 2. Conversion Relationship among Physical Field, Thermal Field and Flow Field

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 核热耦合迭代流程图

Figure 3. Iterative Flowchart of Neutronic-thermohydraulic Coupling

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 三维LMW基准题归一化功率示意图

Figure 4. Normalized Power of 3D LMW

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 二维多组件问题径向几何

Figure 5. Radial Geometry of 2D Multi-assemblies

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 二维多组件问题归一化功率

Figure 6. Normalized Power of 2D Multi-assemblies

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 棒功率偏差分布示意图

Figure 7. Pin-cell Power Deviation Distribution

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 AP1000机组的归一化功率

Figure 8. Normalized Power of AP1000

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 不同时刻的堆芯三维分布

Figure 9. Three-dimensional Distributions of the Core at Different Time

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 不同CPU数目计算时间及并行效率

Table 1. Calculation Time and Parallel Efficiency for Different CPU Number

CPU数目	计算时间/s	并行效率/%
1	268.5	100
2	147.1	91.3
4	78.2	85.8
8	42.7	78.6

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 棒功率分布偏差随时间变化情况

Table 2. Deviation of Pin-cell Power Distribution at Different Time

时刻/s	最大偏差 (SP₃)/%	均方根偏差 (SP₃)/%	最大偏差 (扩散)/%	均方根偏差 (扩散)/%
0.5	−1.7861	0.6606	−2.6712	1.0025
1.0	−3.3670	1.3333	−4.0070	1.6127
2.0	0.9454	0.3019	−1.3593	0.5355
3.0	0.9433	0.3022	−1.3617	0.5354

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(13)

[1]	LI Y Z, HE T, LIANG B N, et al. Development and verification of PWR-core nuclear design code system NECP-Bamboo: Part III: Bamboo-transient[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 359: 110462.
[2]	GARCÍA-HERRANZ N, CUERVO D, SABATER A, et al. Multiscale neutronics/thermal-hydraulics coupling with COBAYA4 code for Pin-by-pin PWR transient analysis[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2017, 321: 38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.03.017
[3]	GRAHN A, KLIEM S, ROHDE U. Coupling of the 3D neutron kinetic core model DYN3D with the CFD software ANSYS-CFX[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2015, 84: 197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2014.12.015
[4]	LEE D, KOZLOWSKI T, DOWNAR T J. Multi-group SP3 approximation for simulation of a three-dimensional PWR rod ejection accident[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2015, 77(mar.):94-100.
[5]	TADA K, YAMAMOTO A, YAMANE Y, et al. Applicability of the diffusion and simplified P3 theories for pin-by-pin geometry of BWR[J]. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 2008, 45(10): 997-1008. doi: 10.1080/18811248.2008.9711885
[6]	谢伟华. 压水堆堆芯三维Pin-by-pin中子动力学计算方法研究[D]. 西安: 西安交通大学, 2018.
[7]	杨文,郑友琦,吴宏春,等. EFEN-SP₃方法的加速与并行计算研究[J]. 原子能科学技术,2013, 47(S2): 664-667.
[8]	WAND YQ, RABITI C, PALMIOTTI G. Parallelization of the red-black algorithm on solving the second-order PN transport equation with the hybrid finite element method[J]. Transactions of American Nuclear Society, 2011, 105: 319-321.
[9]	LI Y Z, ZHANG B, HE Q M, et al. Development and verification of PWR-core fuel management calculation code system NECP-Bamboo: Part I Bamboo-Lattice[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2018, 335: 432-440. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.05.030
[10]	YANG W, WU H C, LI Y Z, et al. Development and verification of PWR-core fuel management calculation code system NECP-Bamboo: Part II Bamboo-Core[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2018, 337: 279-290. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.07.017
[11]	GOLUOGLU S. A deterministic method for transient, three-dimensional neutron transport[D]. Knoxville, USA: The University of Tennessee, 1997.
[12]	SMITH M A, LEWIS E E, NA BC. Benchmark on deterministic 2-D MOX fuel assembly transport calculations without spatial homogenization[J]. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2004, 45(2-4): 107-118
[13]	HOU J, IVANOV K N, BOYARINOV V F, et al. OECD/NEA benchmark for time-dependent neutron transport calculations without spatial homogenization[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2017, 317: 177-189. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.02.008