Advance Search
Volume 44 Issue 5
Oct.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Wu Kuibo, Liang Zhaorui, Zhang Tengfei, Cao Qing, Song Yongjun, Xue Yu, Liu Junjie. Fast Determination of Containment Leakage Rate Based on Pressure Rise Monitoring[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2023, 44(5): 110-115. doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2023.05.0110
Citation: Wu Kuibo, Liang Zhaorui, Zhang Tengfei, Cao Qing, Song Yongjun, Xue Yu, Liu Junjie. Fast Determination of Containment Leakage Rate Based on Pressure Rise Monitoring[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2023, 44(5): 110-115. doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2023.05.0110

Fast Determination of Containment Leakage Rate Based on Pressure Rise Monitoring

doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2023.05.0110
  • Received Date: 2022-11-15
  • Rev Recd Date: 2023-04-14
  • Publish Date: 2023-10-13
  • In this paper, a qualitative and quantitative method for fast determination of containment leakage at the start-up stage of the unit is proposed. Based on the rising trend of containment pressure within 24 h during the unit start-up, the set leakage rate limit is taken as the assumed leakage rate, and the calculated pressure rise is obtained according to the ideal gas state equation and the gas mass balance relationship in the containment, and the leakage situation is qualitatively determined by comparing the calculated pressure rise with the monitored pressure rise. According to the gas mass balance relationship in the containment, the quantitative method can reversely solve the containment leakage rate matching with the monitoring pressure rise. Using the above method, the containment leakage rate of five units in a nuclear power plant is analyzed. The qualitative determination results show that the leakage rate of only one unit exceeds the limit of 5 Nm3/h (Nm3 is the gas volume at 0℃ and 1 standard atmospheric pressure). The quantitative calculation results show that the leakage rate of the unit is 5.11 Nm3/h, which is close to the first daily leakage rate of 4.98 Nm3/h, indicating that the method proposed in this paper has good accuracy.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    朱建斌,刘晓龙. 核电厂安全壳内温度变化对泄漏率测量的影响[J]. 产业与科技论坛,2020, 19(19): 57-58.
    [2]
    褚英杰,欧阳钦. 安全壳整体泄漏率计算方法的比较分析[J]. 核动力工程,2010, 31(6): 33-37.
    [3]
    章春伟,杨永灯,乔宇,等. 安全壳泄漏率在线监测系统原理及数据分析[J]. 核安全,2014, 13(2): 55-60.
    [4]
    梁斌,王雷,韩正. 浅谈CPR1000新建机组安全壳日常泄漏率异常频发原因及预防措施[J]. 科技视界,2016(6): 127,136.
    [5]
    刘跃锋,刘祖伦,杨峰,等. 安全壳泄漏率在机组启动阶段的超限分析及处理[J]. 中国核电,2017, 10(3): 399-404.
    [6]
    WANG H, LIU J Q, XIE G Y, et al. A method of containment leakage rate estimation based on convolution neural network[J]. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2021, 9: 637283. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2021.637283
    [7]
    李晓庚. 核电站安全壳泄漏率计算模型与分析[J]. 科技创新导报,2015(36): 153-154.
    [8]
    何锐,贾武同,赵健. 安全壳泄漏率测量仪表体积权重分配方法研究[J]. 核动力工程,2015, 36(6): 101-104.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(5)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (680) PDF downloads(72) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return