Advance Search
Volume 45 Issue 1
Feb.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Cui Huaiming, Tan Xin, Wang Yan, Kuang Chengxiao, Su Shu. Study on Transient Hydraulic Load of Reactor Coolant System under the Condition of Reactor Coolant Pump Rotor Seizure[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2024, 45(1): 230-236. doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2024.01.0230
Citation: Cui Huaiming, Tan Xin, Wang Yan, Kuang Chengxiao, Su Shu. Study on Transient Hydraulic Load of Reactor Coolant System under the Condition of Reactor Coolant Pump Rotor Seizure[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2024, 45(1): 230-236. doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2024.01.0230

Study on Transient Hydraulic Load of Reactor Coolant System under the Condition of Reactor Coolant Pump Rotor Seizure

doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2024.01.0230
  • Received Date: 2023-03-09
  • Rev Recd Date: 2023-11-15
  • Publish Date: 2024-02-15
  • In order to truly reflect the transient internal flow transition process and hydraulic load impact of the reactor coolant system under accident conditions, a high-precision three-dimensional closed system transient flow calculation method was established for the HPR1000 reactor and its primary system, and the pressure wave oscillation law and transient hydraulic load characteristics of the pipeline of the reactor and primary system during the transition process were obtained. The results show that: in the end of the reactor coolant pump rotor seizure, the flow rate at the reactor coolant pump outlet decreased to 81.3% of that in stable operation. During the transition process of the rotor seizure, the maximum pressure peak value in the system pipeline is located at the inlet section of the reactor coolant pump, which is 16.00 MPa; the minimum pressure valley value is located at the outlet section of the reactor coolant pump, which is 15.01 MPa. Finally, the pressure of each monitoring point in the system tends to the reference pressure of 15.50 MPa. Under the dual influence of the piping layout of reactor coolant system and the rotor seizure accident of reactor coolant pump, the fluid velocity of each section shows obvious uneven distribution, and obvious eddy currents occurs. The variation rule of hydraulic load on each wall of the system is consistent with the variation rule of system pressure pulsation. The maximum load force peak is located at the W3 wall at the first elbow of the transition section, which is 3.163×106 N; the minimum load force valley value is located at the W12 wall of the elbow at the inlet of the reactor pressure vessel, which is 9.125×105 N. This numerical prediction method can provide technical support for the design and safety assessment of the reactor coolant pipeline under the condition of the reactor coolant pump rotor seizure.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    刘昌文,李庆,李兰,等. “华龙一号”反应堆及一回路系统研发与设计[J]. 中国核电,2017, 10(4): 472-477,512.
    [2]
    荆春宁,赵科,张力友,等. “华龙一号”的设计理念与总体技术特征[J]. 中国核电,2017, 10(4): 463-467.
    [3]
    王永强,杨滨,武焕春,等. 揭秘核电材料——核电站一回路主管道材料及其制备工艺[J]. 金属世界,2013(1): 37-41.
    [4]
    TANG J X, LU D G, LIANG J T, et al. Numerical simulation on asymmetrical three-dimensional thermal and hydraulic characteristics of the primary sodium pool under the pump stuck accident in CEFR[J]. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2021, 195(5): 478-495. doi: 10.1080/00295639.2020.1834314
    [5]
    WANG X L, LU Y G, ZHU R S, et al. Study on the transient evolution law of internal flow field and dynamic stress of reactor coolant pump under rotor seizure accident[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2019, 133: 35-45. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2019.05.001
    [6]
    LU Y G, ZHU R S, WANG X L, et al. Experimental study on transient performance in the coasting transition process of shutdown for reactor coolant pump[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2019, 346: 192-199. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.03.007
    [7]
    靖剑平,乔雪冬,贾斌,等. 基于RELAP5程序的AP1000典型事故瞬态特性研究[J]. 原子能科学技术,2015, 49(4): 646-653.
    [8]
    齐炳雪,俞冀阳. 超临界水冷堆的安全分析[J]. 原子能科学技术,2012, 46(6): 669-673.
    [9]
    王亚云. 核主泵及其系统过渡过程瞬态特性研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学,2018.
    [10]
    DIEN L D, DIEP D N. Verification of VVER-1200 NPP simulator in normal operation and reactor coolant pump coast-down transient[J]. World Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2017, 5(3): 507-519. doi: 10.4236/wjet.2017.53043
    [11]
    余红星,黄代顺. 秦山核电二期工程设计基准事故水力学载荷分析[J]. 核动力工程,2003, 24(S1): 102-105.
    [12]
    李文姬,吕红,张洁. LOCA水力载荷分析软件HLPS的开发与验证[J]. 核动力工程,2021, 42(4): 159-165.
    [13]
    卢喜丰,熊夫睿,刘文进,等. “华龙一号”蒸汽发生器传热管失水事故应力响应分析[J]. 压力容器,2021, 38(12): 70-76.
    [14]
    肖文宇,范正伟. 小破口失水事故瞬态水力载荷计算中破口尺寸的影响[J]. 管道技术与设备,2020(6): 21-23.
    [15]
    辛素芳,李松蔚,任春明,等. 蒸汽发生器U型管CFD简化方法研究[J]. 核动力工程,2018, 39(S1): 41-44.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(14)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (56) PDF downloads(19) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return