Advance Search
Volume 46 Issue S1
Jul.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Liu Runze, Liu Zhouyu. Research on Quadratic Depletion Method for Reaction Rate Based on NECP-X[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2025, 46(S1): 282-287. doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2025.S1.0282
Citation: Liu Runze, Liu Zhouyu. Research on Quadratic Depletion Method for Reaction Rate Based on NECP-X[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2025, 46(S1): 282-287. doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2025.S1.0282

Research on Quadratic Depletion Method for Reaction Rate Based on NECP-X

doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2025.S1.0282
  • Received Date: 2025-01-15
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-04-14
  • Publish Date: 2025-06-15
  • In depletion calculations, especially for gadolinium-bearing fuels, each burnup step often requires two flux calculations for predictor and corrector. However, in high-fidelity calculations, performing two physical calculations significantly reduces computational efficiency, leading to excessively high time costs in fuel cycle calculations. In this paper, quadratic depletion (QD) method is adopted in high-fidelity code NECP-X. The flux calculation in predictor is skipped, and a post-correction method is adopted to correct the number densities of seven gadolinium isotopes. In the correction step, quadratic interpolation is used for the reaction rates of gadolinium isotopes to improve the accuracy of depletion calculations of gadolinium-bearing fuels. Comparative depletion calculations are performed for both single-assembly and multi-assembly Gd-bearing fuel cases using traditional predictor-corrector method and quadratic depletion method. The results show that the quadratic depletion method cannot only improve the accuracy by at least a factor of 2, but also increase the efficiency by approximately 30%. Therefore, the proposed QD method can be well applied in Gd-bearing fuel depletion calculations.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    YAMAMOTO A, TATSUMI M, SUGIMURA N. Projected predictor-corrector method for lattice physics burnup calculations[J]. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2009, 163(2): 144-151. doi: 10.13182/NSE08-80
    [2]
    JEON S, CHOI N, JOO H G. Neighbor-informed burnup correction for gadolinia depletion in pin-homogenized core calculation[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2003, 192: 109946.
    [3]
    ISOTALO A, SAHLBERG V. Comparison of neutronics-depletion coupling schemes for burnup calculations[J]. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2015, 179(4): 434-459. doi: 10.13182/NSE14-35
    [4]
    ISOTALO A. Comparison of neutronics-depletion coupling schemes for burnup calculations-continued study[J]. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2015, 180(3): 286-300. doi: 10.13182/NSE14-92
    [5]
    田超,郑友琦,李云召,等. 高阶预估-校正燃耗方法在压水堆组件计算中的应用[J]. 原子能科学技术,2017, 51(10): 1765-1770. doi: 10.7538/yzk.2017.51.10.1765.
    [6]
    LEE D, RHODES J, SMITH K. Quadratic depletion method for gadolinium isotopes in CASMO-5[J]. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2013, 174(1): 79-86. doi: 10.13182/NSE12-20
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(9)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (4) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return