Advance Search
Volume 43 Issue 2
Apr.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
He Feng, Yao Di, Wang Xinjun, Li Yilei, Bai Xiaoming, Xiong Furui. Research on Test and Theoretical Analysis Methods on Stability of LBB Circumferential Through-Wall Crack in Austenitic Stainless Steel Pipe under Dynamic Load[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2022, 43(2): 133-137. doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2022.02.0133
Citation: He Feng, Yao Di, Wang Xinjun, Li Yilei, Bai Xiaoming, Xiong Furui. Research on Test and Theoretical Analysis Methods on Stability of LBB Circumferential Through-Wall Crack in Austenitic Stainless Steel Pipe under Dynamic Load[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2022, 43(2): 133-137. doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2022.02.0133

Research on Test and Theoretical Analysis Methods on Stability of LBB Circumferential Through-Wall Crack in Austenitic Stainless Steel Pipe under Dynamic Load

doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2022.02.0133
  • Received Date: 2021-07-20
  • Accepted Date: 2021-08-16
  • Rev Recd Date: 2021-08-05
  • Publish Date: 2022-04-02
  • Judging whether the circumferential through-wall crack of pipe is stable is one of the criteria to judge whether the pipe meets the Leak-Before-Break (LBB) design criteria. In order to ensure the safety and reliability of LBB technology, the stability of circumferential through-wall crack of pipe under dynamic load is studied and analyzed by experiment. The horizontal impact machine was used to carry out the impact test on the pipe with circumferential through-wall crack without operating pressure at high temperature with the loading speed of 1.22 m/s, 2 m/s, 3 m/s, 4 m/s in order to obtain the test limit load values at each strain rate, and then compared with the engineering theoretical analysis and calculation results. The results show that the failure mode of circumferential through-wall cracks in austenitic stainless steel pipe under dynamic load is plastic instability. Through the verification of the test, when LBB analysis is carried out for austenitic stainless steel pipe under dynamic load in the project, the theoretical analysis method of limit load in the standard review plan 3.6.3 leak-before-break evaluation procedures (SRP 3.6.3) of the NRC has high engineering safety. If the mechanical properties of materials under quasi-static state are adopted at the same time, the engineering safety is higher.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    张毅雄,姜乃斌,艾红雷,等. 反应堆冷却剂系统非线性地震分析方法研究[J]. 原子能科学技术,2008, 42(S2): 407-410.
    [2]
    王超,要巍. 浅析秦山第二核电厂事故情况下安全壳消氢[J]. 科技视界,2016(15): 239-240. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-2457.2016.15.184
    [3]
    REN Y, TAN C W, ZHANG J, et al. Dynamic fracture of Ti-6Al-4V alloy in Taylor impact test[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2011, 21(2): 223-235. doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(11)60703-6
    [4]
    周剑秋,沈士明. 确定含环向缺陷压力管道临界裂纹长度的分析研究[J]. 压力容器,1997, 14(1): 61-65.
    [5]
    ASME. Rules for inservice inspection of nuclear power plant components: ASME BPVC-XI-2015[S]. New York: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2015
    [6]
    NRC. Standard review plan 3.6. 3 leak-before-break evaluation procedures: NUREG—0800[S]. Rockville: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2007
    [7]
    中国核工业集团有限公司. 压水堆核电厂高能管道破前漏设计规范: Q/CNNC HLBZ DA 3—2018[S]. 北京: 核工业标准化研究所, 2018
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(10)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (423) PDF downloads(33) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return