华龙一号国际审查认证中结构完整性领域的实践和思考

毛庆; 张涛; 徐晓; 岑鹏; 王国锋

doi:10.13832/j.jnpe.2024.02.0001

华龙一号国际审查认证中结构完整性领域的实践和思考

doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2024.02.0001

毛庆^{1, 3,},
张涛^{1, 2},
徐晓^{1, 2},
岑鹏^{1, 2},
王国锋³

1.
核电安全技术与装备全国重点实验室，广东深圳，518172
2.
深圳中广核工程设计有限公司，广东深圳，518172
3.
中广核工程有限公司，广东深圳，518172

详细信息

作者简介:
毛　庆（1969—），男，正研级高级工程师，现主要从事工程力学方面的研究，E-mail: maoqing2009@cgnpc.com.cn

中图分类号: TL48
计量
- 文章访问数: 91
- HTML全文浏览量: 12
- PDF下载量: 58
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-12-05
- 修回日期: 2023-12-25
- 刊出日期: 2024-04-12

Practice and Learning in the Field of Structural Integrity during the HPR1000 International Regulatory and Certified Review

Mao Qing^{1, 3
,},
Zhang Tao^{1, 2},
Xu Xiao^{1, 2},
Cen Peng^{1, 2},
Wang Guofeng³

1.
State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Power Safety Technology and Equipment, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518172, China
2.
China Nuclear Power Design Company, Co., Ltd. (Shen Zhen), Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518172, China
3.
China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518172, China

摘要

摘要: 为促进国际市场开发，中国广核集团有限公司开展了华龙一号核电技术方案英国通用设计审查（GDA）和欧洲用户要求认证（EUR）。核电厂构筑物、系统和设备的结构完整性是国际审查和认证的重点，为适应英国核安全监管和欧洲用户要求，项目团队采用分析法设计理念，以力学分析、试验和论证为关键手段，完成了英国版和欧洲版华龙一号的结构完整性分析评估和设计改进，全面满足了英国核安全监管和欧洲用户要求。通过华龙一号国际审查和认证，研究了结构完整性领域的相关技术要求，总结了审查过程中的实践和思考，可为华龙一号核电技术方案的持续改进和创新提供借鉴。
- 华龙一号（HPR1000） /
- 英国通用设计审查（GDA） /
- 欧洲用户要求认证（EUR） /
- 结构完整性（SI）
Abstract: In order to promote the international market development, China General Nuclear Power Group (CGN) has carried out the Generic Design Assessment (GDA) of UK and the European Utility Requirements (EUR) assessment. The structural integrity of the structures, systems and components in nuclear power plant is the focus of international review and certification. In order to meet the requirements of British nuclear safety supervision and EUR, the project team adopted the design concept of analytical method, and completed the structural integrity analysis, evaluation and design improvement of British and European versions of HPR1000 with mechanical analysis, test and demonstration as the key means, which fully met the requirements of British nuclear safety supervision and EUR. Through the HPR1000 international regulatory and certified review, the relevant technical requirements in the field of structural integrity are studied, and the practice and learning in the review process are summarized, which can support the continuous improvement and innovation of HPR1000 technology.
- HPR1000 /
- GDA /
- EUR /
- Structural integrity

HTML全文

图 1 Safety Case的CAE结构

Figure 1. CAE Structure in Safety Case

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 考虑埋置效应计算模型

Figure 2. Calculation Model Considering the Embedded Effect　　

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 埋置效应对楼层反应谱的影响对比

g—重力加速度

Figure 3. Comparison of Floor Response Spectra with or without Considering Embedded Effect　　

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 结构-土-结构相互作用敏感性分析模型

Figure 4. Sensitivity Study of SSSI Effect

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 不同地基土条件下结构-土-结构相互作用影响分析结果对比

Figure 5. Comparison of SSSI Effect Analysis Results for Different Soil Stiffness

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 飞机撞击数值模拟分析

Figure 6. Numerical Simulation Analysis for Aircraft Impact

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 安全壳建模分解图

Figure 7. Containment Modeling Breakdown Diagram

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 截锥体区域设计简化图

Figure 8. Simplified Diagram of Truncated Cone Area Design

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 安全壳应力云图

Figure 9. Containment Stress Distribution

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 反应堆压力容器顶盖跌落和乏燃料罐跌落对结构影响评价

Figure 10. Structural Assessment of Dropped Load by Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Assembly and Spent Fuel Cask

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 高能管道失效甩击设备分析（蒸汽发生器下封头）

Figure 11. Analysis of High Energy Pipe Failure Whip Impacting on Equipment (SG Lower Head)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 重物跌落冲击设备分析（反应堆压力容器）

Figure 12. Analysis of Heavy Load Dropped Impacting on Equipment (RPV)　　

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 失效评定图和极限裂纹尺寸示意图

L_r—载荷比；K_r—断裂比；L_r-Max—L_r的容许极限；FAC—失效评定曲线；f(L_r)—关于L_r的函数　　　　　

Figure 13. FAD and Limiting Defect Size

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(21)

[1]	Office for Nuclear Regulation. Safety assessment principles for nuclear facilities[EB/OL]. (2020-01-01)[2023-11-30]. https://www.onr.org.uk/saps/saps2014.pdf.
[2]	Environment Agency. Process and information document for generic assessment of candidate nuclear power plant designs[EB/OL]. (2016-10-01)[2023-11-30]. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a801f7ce5274a2e87db7fc8/LIT_7998.pdf.
[3]	毛庆,方亮. 英国核电通用设计审查特色与实践[J]. 核安全,2023, 22(1): 16-22.
[4]	European Organisation. European utility requirements for LWR nuclear power plants: Revision E[R]. Barcelona: European Organisation, 2017.
[5]	American Society of Civil Engineers. Seismic analysis of safety-related nuclear structures: ASCE 4-16[S]. Virginia: ASCE, 2016: 22-28.
[6]	Nuclear Energy Institute. Methodology for performing aircraft impact assessments for new plant designs: NEI 07-13[S]. Washington DC: Nuclear Energy Institute, 2009:1-6.
[7]	方秦,吴昊,张涛. 核电站在大型商用客机撞击下损伤破坏研究进展[J]. 建筑结构学报,2019, 40(5): 1-27.
[8]	贡金鑫,冯治斌,郭书恒,等. 美国核电厂混凝土安全壳规范抗剪设计方法的演变[J]. 建筑结构,2018, 48(16): 1-8.
[9]	蓝天云,吴峥宇,肖丹,等. 核安全壳截锥体区域受力性能试验研究[J]. 核动力工程,2023, 44(4): 107-115.
[10]	宋辰宁,侯钢领,周国良. 核电厂安全壳极限抗压承载力及影响因素分析[J]. 核科学与工程,2015, 35(1): 95-102.
[11]	American Concrete Institute. Code requirements for nuclear safety-related concrete structures and commentary: ACI 349-13[S]. Farmington Hills: ACI Committee 349, 2014: 53-55.
[12]	International Atomic Energy Agency. Safety aspects of nuclear power plants in human induced external events: assessment of structures: safety reports series No.87[R]. Vienna: IAEA, 2018.
[13]	International Atomic Energy Agency. Protection against internal hazards in the design of nuclear power plants: IAEA safety standards series No. SSG-64[R]. IAEA: Vienna, 2021.
[14]	Office for Nuclear Regulation. Internal hazards nuclear safety technical assessment guide[EB/OL]. (2022-12-01)[2023-11-30]. https://www.onr.org.uk/operational/tech_asst_guides/index.htm.
[15]	AFCEN. Prevention of damages in mechanical components, introduction to the design, analysis and construction rules of the RCC-M: Criteria RCC-M[S]. Paris: AFCEN, 2014: 35-44.
[16]	Magnox Electric. R3 Impact assessment procedure - missiles, blast, jets, pipewhip and impact[R]. South Gloucestershire: Magnox North limited, 2003.
[17]	Steel Construction Institute. Protection of piping systems subject to fires and explosions[R]. Berkshire: Health and Safety Executive, 2005.
[18]	Office for Nuclear Regulation. Guidance on mechanics of assessment(NS-TAST-GD-096)[EB/OL]. (2022-12-01)[2023-11-30]. https://www.onr.org.uk/operational/tech_asst_guides/ns-tast-gd-096.docx.
[19]	EDF Energy. R6: assessment of the integrity of structures containing defects: Revision 4[R]. Gloucester: EDF Energy, 2001.
[20]	AFCEN. Design and construction rules for mechanical components of PWR nuclear islands: RCC-M-Edition 2007[S]. Paris: AFCEN, 2007: B3000/38-39.
[21]	AFCEN. In-Service Inspection Rules for Mechanical Components of PWR Nuclear Islands: RSE-M-2010 Edition-Addendum 2012[S]. Paris: AFCEN, 2012: B5000/49-63.