Advance Search
Volume 43 Issue 6
Dec.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Zhu Wei, Hou Qinmai, Cai Ning, Xu Sai, Zhu Jie, Li Qiuqi. Analysis on Validity of Test Data of Primary Circuit Pressure Boundary Leakage Rate[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2022, 43(6): 174-179. doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2022.06.0174
Citation: Zhu Wei, Hou Qinmai, Cai Ning, Xu Sai, Zhu Jie, Li Qiuqi. Analysis on Validity of Test Data of Primary Circuit Pressure Boundary Leakage Rate[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2022, 43(6): 174-179. doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2022.06.0174

Analysis on Validity of Test Data of Primary Circuit Pressure Boundary Leakage Rate

doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2022.06.0174
  • Received Date: 2022-03-07
  • Rev Recd Date: 2022-09-20
  • Publish Date: 2022-12-14
  • The primary circuit pressure boundary gas leakage rate test of a research reactor is interfered by small volume, equipment cooling water and other factors, and there are extreme sample points in the test data. On the basis of not changing the test method, the effectiveness of the test results is ensured by using the significance test and variance analysis of the regression model. The test method draws lessons from the test method of containment leakage rate of PWR. In this paper, three commonly used methods for calculating the leakage rate of the containment, including ANSI/ANS-56.8, RCC-G-1988, and ПНАЭГ-10-021-90, are used for calculation and analysis. The results show that the calculation results of the three methods are basically the same. By analyzing the independence, normality and variance property of residuals in linear regression model, the influence of regression diagnosis on the calculation results is discussed. At the same time, for the problems of heterogeneity of variance, autocorrelation and extreme sample points found in regression diagnosis, the final results are modified by combining the residual weighted least square method and removing extreme sample points, and the reliability of the results is improved. The analysis method in this paper has been applied to nuclear safety review.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    孔祥波,王纳秀,林良程,等. 高温熔盐试验回路系统设计及验证研究[J]. 核动力工程,2020, 41(5): 127-131.
    [2]
    American Nuclear Society. American national standard containment system leakage testing requirements: ANSI/ANS-56.8-2002[S]. La Grange Park: American Nuclear Society, 2002: 5-11.
    [3]
    EDF. Design and construction rules for civil works for PWR nuclear islands: RCC-G volume Ⅰ-design-1988[S]. Avenue Dutrievoz: EDF Equipment EEPTEN, 1988: 365-369.
    [4]
    褚英杰,欧阳钦. 安全壳整体泄漏率计算方法的比较分析[J]. 核动力工程,2010, 31(6): 33-37.
    [5]
    薛文博,陈士军. 关于安全壳整体密封试验的俄标与美标差异分析[J]. 商品与质量,2016(47): 362-363.
    [6]
    国家能源局. 核电厂安全壳密封性试验: NB/T 20018-2010[S]. 北京: 原子能出版社, 2010: 8-15.
    [7]
    彭巧云,惠爽爽,李彦华. 安全壳整体密封性试验泄漏率的计算方法[J]. 科技创新导报,2013(10): 26-27. doi: 10.16660/j.cnki.1674-098x.2013.10.034
    [8]
    时朝杰. 核电厂安全壳泄漏率数据增大的分析及处理[J]. 科技视界,2016(8): 95-96. doi: 10.19694/j.cnki.issn2095-2457.2016.08.067
    [9]
    陈希孺. 概率论与数理统计[M]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 2009: 264-268.
    [10]
    沈东明,蔡建涛,何锐,等. 基于统计软件R的安全壳泄漏率试验数据有效性分析[J]. 核动力工程,2020, 41(5): 99-103.
    [11]
    沈东明,何锐,张骥. 基于时间序列分析方法对安全壳泄漏率测量阶段的气体弛豫过程研究[J]. 核动力工程,2021, 42(5): 178-181.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(5)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (163) PDF downloads(30) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return