Advance Search
Volume 46 Issue 1
Feb.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Hua Xinchao, Pan Deng, Li Yao, Peng Yipeng, Liu Jiaqing. Feasibility Study of 24-month Refueling for VVER[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2025, 46(1): 24-29. doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2025.01.0024
Citation: Hua Xinchao, Pan Deng, Li Yao, Peng Yipeng, Liu Jiaqing. Feasibility Study of 24-month Refueling for VVER[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2025, 46(1): 24-29. doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2025.01.0024

Feasibility Study of 24-month Refueling for VVER

doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2025.01.0024
  • Received Date: 2024-05-09
  • Rev Recd Date: 2024-10-14
  • Publish Date: 2025-02-15
  • In order to reduce the number of refueling overhauls within the service life of VVER, improve the unit capacity factor, and increase annual power generation, this paper studies the feasibility of realizing the 24-month refueling cycle of VVER by increasing the average 235U enrichment of fuel assemblies and the number of refueling batches using KASKAD software package, so as to design a long and short alternative 24-month long cycle core refueling scheme. The analysis of the calculation results of this scheme shows that the duration of cycle is 633.5 EFPD (effective full power days) or 667.1 EFPD, respectively, and each core characteristic parameter meets the design limit requirements and has a large margin. Compared with the current 18-month core refueling cycle scheme, this scheme has good economic benefits. When the international natural uranium purchase price does not exceed 60 dollars/pound, each unit will bring at least 12 million yuan of income per year. Therefore, the core loading scheme of the 24-month refueling equilibrium cycle studied in this paper has good safety, economy and flexibility, and has very good engineering application value.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    位金锋,许星星,付学峰,等. 177堆芯24个月换料可行性研究[J]. 强激光与粒子束,2017, 29(1): 016020. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.160336
    [2]
    SECKER J R, JOHANSEN B J, STUCKER D L, et al. Optimum discharge burnup and cycle length for PWRs[J]. Nuclear Technology, 2005, 151(2): 109-119. doi: 10.13182/NT05-A3636
    [3]
    GREGG R, WORRALL A. Effect of highly enriched/highly burnt UO2 fuels on fuel cycle costs, radiotoxicity, and nuclear design parameters[J]. Nuclear Technology, 2005, 151(2): 126-132. doi: 10.13182/NT05-A3638
    [4]
    HOVE C. 24-month PWR fuel cycles-Two decades of AREVA design and operating experience[C]//Topical meeting on advances in nuclear fuel managment. Virginia: AREVA Inc., 2015.
    [5]
    王丹,王金雨. 24个月换料周期燃料管理初步研究[J]. 核动力工程,2013, 34(S1): 99-102.
    [6]
    王丽华,曹泓,杨波,等. 核电厂多种长周期换料策略研究及改进[J]. 核科学与工程,2019, 39(6): 922-927. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-0918.2019.06.010
    [7]
    钱纪生. WWER-1000压水堆核电厂运行物理[M]. 北京: 中国原子能出版社,2011: 260-279.
    [8]
    姚红,刘国明,高鑫. 157组组件堆芯燃料管理方案设计及其经济性分析[J]. 核科学与工程,2016, 36(2): 273-278. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-0918.2016.02.021
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(4)  / Tables(7)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (25) PDF downloads(3) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return