Online Maintenance Optimization of HPR1000

Ding Xiaochuan; Li Wenjing; Feng Churan; Yang Xiaoyan

doi:10.13832/j.jnpe.2024.01.0225

Volume 45 Issue 1

Feb. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Nuclear Power Engineering > 2024 > 45(1): 225-229

Ding Xiaochuan, Li Wenjing, Feng Churan, Yang Xiaoyan. Online Maintenance Optimization of HPR1000[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2024, 45(1): 225-229. doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2024.01.0225

Citation:

Ding Xiaochuan, Li Wenjing, Feng Churan, Yang Xiaoyan. Online Maintenance Optimization of HPR1000[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2024, 45(1): 225-229. doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2024.01.0225

Ding Xiaochuan, Li Wenjing, Feng Churan, Yang Xiaoyan. Online Maintenance Optimization of HPR1000[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2024, 45(1): 225-229. doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2024.01.0225

Citation:

Ding Xiaochuan, Li Wenjing, Feng Churan, Yang Xiaoyan. Online Maintenance Optimization of HPR1000[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2024, 45(1): 225-229. doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2024.01.0225

PDF( 3578 KB)

Online Maintenance Optimization of HPR1000

doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2024.01.0225

China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing, 100840, China

Received Date: 2023-03-27
Rev Recd Date: 2023-05-23
Publish Date: 2024-02-15

Abstract

Abstract

Carrying out online maintenance to reduce the maintenance items during outage is an important means to optimize the outage duration and improve the unit economy. In foreign countries, real-time configuration risk calculation tools have been used to calculate Risk Informed Completion Time (RICT), and online maintenance has been achieved through this tool. In this paper, the feasibility of online maintenance of HPR1000 is demonstrated by the risk-informed method without using real-time risk calculation tools. The research shows that in order to carry out on-line maintenance, it is necessary to permanently adjust the frontstop completion time (FSCT) of one safety system train inoperable from 3 days to 7 days. Thanks to the overall design balance and optimization of HPR1000, the importance of single equipment decreases, and the risk increment caused by this change is limited compared with the risk threshold. After perfecting and applying the real-time configuration risk calculation tool in the future, the flexibility of online maintenance scheme can be improved, and the maintenance period can be further extended to reduce the schedule pressure of maintenance.
- Risk-informed,
- Frontstop completion time (FSCT),
- Online maintenance

FullText(HTML)

References(21)

References

[1]	王先锋. 大亚湾核电站换料大修优化研究[D]. 上海:上海交通大学,2008:59-66.
[2]	曹杰,查卫华,高斌,等. 基于关键链技术的核电大修进度管理方法研究[J]. 核安全,2018,17(6):44-55.
[3]	凌天云. 核电站多机组换料大修计划管理[D]. 上海:上海交通大学,2007:45-47.
[4]	王军,贾国安. CEPR机组大修设计特点分析[J]. 核动力工程,2015,36(S1):44-46.
[5]	朱玲倩. 核电机组大修中长期规划策略研究[J]. 中国核电,2019,12(4):452-455.
[6]	常宝盛. 核电站机组大修的工期控制难点与优化[J]. 核动力工程,2001,22(6):551-553.
[7]	杨茂春,陈德淦. 大亚湾核电站大修中职业照射控制的实践与经验[J]. 辐射防护,2004,24(3-4):144-154.
[8]	NEI. Risk managed technical specification guidelines: NEI 06-09[R]. Nuclear Energy Institute, 2007: 3-5.
[9]	U. S. NRC. Standard technical specifications-Westinghouse plants, volume 1, specifications: NUREG-1431[R]. Washington, DC: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2021.
[10]	国家核安全局. 核电厂配置风险管理的技术政策(试行)[Z]. 北京:国家核安全局,2019.
[11]	国家核安全局. 特定电厂风险指引决策方法:技术规格书:NNSA-0148[R]. 北京:国家核安全局,2012.
[12]	依岩,种毅敏,李琼哲,等. PSA在核电厂技术规范优化中的应用[J]. 核科学与工程,2015,35(4):766-773.
[13]	杜东晓,何建东,仇永萍,等. 核电厂风险指引型允许后撤时间(AOT)优化研究[J]. 核科学与工程,2018,38(2):239-245.
[14]	常宝盛,郭建兵,陈捷飞. 大亚湾核电站应急柴油发电机后撤时间延长的概率安全评价[J]. 核科学与工程,2007,27(4):349-354.
[15]	国家能源局发布. RK应用于核电厂的一级概率安全评价第1部分:总体要求:NB/T 20037.1-2017[S]. 北京:中国原子能出版社,2017.
[16]	国家能源局发布. 应用于核电厂的二级概率安全评价第1部分:总体要求:NB/T 20445.1-2017[S]. 北京:中国原子能出版社,2017.
[17]	中国核电工程有限公司. 福建福清核电厂5、6号机组最终安全分析报告第19章:CPX00620001CNPE02GN[R]. 北京:中国核电工程有限公司,2020.
[18]	中国核电工程有限公司. 福建福清核电厂1、2号机组最终安全分析报告第19章:FQX00620001CNPE02GN[R]. 北京:中国核电工程有限公司,2014.
[19]	荆春宁,赵科,张力友,等. “华龙一号”的设计理念与总体技术特征[J]. 中国核电,2017,10(4):463-467.
[20]	宋代勇,赵斌,袁霞,等. “华龙一号”能动与非能动相结合的安全系统设计[J]. 中国核电,2017,10(4):468-471.
[21]	中国核电工程有限公司. 福建福清核电厂5、6号机组最终安全分析报告第16章:CPX00620001CNPE02GN[R]. 北京:中国核电工程有限公司,2019.