Application of Orthogonal Experimental Design in Fuel Rod Test Case Design

He Kangnian; Ding Ming; Guo Zehua; Zhu Yanan; Wei Chao

doi:10.13832/j.jnpe.2024.05.0249

Volume 45 Issue 5

Oct. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Nuclear Power Engineering > 2024 > 45(5): 249-255

He Kangnian, Ding Ming, Guo Zehua, Zhu Yanan, Wei Chao. Application of Orthogonal Experimental Design in Fuel Rod Test Case Design[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2024, 45(5): 249-255. doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2024.05.0249

Citation:

He Kangnian, Ding Ming, Guo Zehua, Zhu Yanan, Wei Chao. Application of Orthogonal Experimental Design in Fuel Rod Test Case Design[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2024, 45(5): 249-255. doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2024.05.0249

Citation:

PDF( 5126 KB)

Application of Orthogonal Experimental Design in Fuel Rod Test Case Design

doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2024.05.0249

1.
Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Power System & Equipment, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China
2.
China Nuclear Power Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518026, China
3.
Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center, MEE, Beijing, 100082, China

Received Date: 2023-10-27
Rev Recd Date: 2024-07-10
Publish Date: 2024-10-14

Abstract

Abstract

In order to assess the impact brought about by parameter uncertainty on fuel elements performance, combinations of parameters within the error range of the fuel elements at the design stage need to be calculated and evaluated. Orthogonal experimental methods were used to take values for combinations of key parameters of the rod fuel elements and to prepare test cases. Mixed-level orthogonal tables were prepared based on the selected key design parameters and the levels of each parameter, and 36 sets of test cases were identified. Test calculations were performed on the 36 cases, and the results showed that the total cladding deformation of some test cases did not satisfy the fuel rod design guidelines, indicating that the parameter uncertainty negatively affected the fuel element behavior. The preparation and analysis of the test cases provide guidance for the design of fuel elements.
- Rod-shaped fuel elements,
- Orthogonal experimental method,
- Orthogonal table,
- Sensitivity analysis,
- Performance analysis of fuel elements

FullText(HTML)

References(18)

References

[1]	韩智杰,季松涛,张应超. 燃料元件瞬态性能分析程序FTPAC验证及应用[J]. 原子能科学技术,2014, 48(S1): 389-393.
[2]	殷明阳,青涛,余霖,等. 模块式小型堆燃料棒设计及性能验证[J]. 科技视界,2021(12): 30-32.
[3]	邓超群,向烽瑞,贺亚男,等. 基于MOOSE平台的棒状燃料元件性能瞬态分析程序开发与验证[J]. 原子能科学技术,2021, 55(8): 1429-1439.
[4]	杨震,苏光辉,田文喜,等. 水堆燃料元件性能分析及程序FROBA开发[J]. 原子能科学技术,2012, 46(5): 590-595.
[5]	邢硕,张坤,陈平,等. 燃料棒性能分析程序FUPAC V2.0的研发与验证[J]. 原子能科学技术,2021, 55(11): 2048-2053.
[6]	许多挺,金鑫,卫小艳,等. 基于Dakota的燃料棒设计验证不确定度研究[J]. 强激光与粒子束,2022, 34(2): 026012.
[7]	周勤. 压水堆燃料棒设计参数不确定性研究[J]. 原子能科学技术,2003, 37(S1): 5-9.
[8]	王璐,张林,涂腾,等. 燃料棒设计关键参数敏感性分析[J]. 应用科技,2019, 46(6): 69-72.
[9]	LANNING D D, BERNA G A. FRAPCON-3: integral assessment: AC06-76RL01830[R]. Washington: Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1997.
[10]	ONDERS J P, SESHU P, NAGANATHAN N G. Taguchi optimization of strain transfer in an induced strain actuator[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 1996, 5(3): 327-337. doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/5/3/011
[11]	于秀山. 正交试验设计方法在测试用例设计中的应用[J]. 计算机工程与应用,2004, 40(20): 62-63,76. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-8331.2004.20.019
[12]	李云雁,胡传荣. 实验设计与数据处理[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社,2005: 79-83.
[13]	黄清华,张万昌. SWAT模型参数敏感性分析及应用[J]. 干旱区地理,2010, 33(1): 8-15.
[14]	王晨阳. 船用非能动余热排出系统可靠性分析方法研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学,2020: 106.
[15]	王红艳,邹向楠. 基于Morris方法的压电悬臂梁结构参数灵敏度分析[J]. 齐齐哈尔大学学报: 自然科学版,2023, 39(3): 14-18.
[16]	WANG C Y, PENG M J, XIA G L. Sensitivity analysis based on Morris method of passive system performance under ocean conditions[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2020, 137: 107067. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2019.107067
[17]	HERNANDEZ C R, WALLENIUS J, LUXAT J. Dynamic sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of a small lead cooled reactor[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2020, 144: 107512. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107512
[18]	田盛,程蓉珍. 压水堆燃料组件设计准则[J]. 核动力工程,1986, 7(3): 27-32,97.