Advance Search
Volume 42 Issue S2
Dec.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Jing Futing, Lyu Huanwen, Zhu Jianping, Gao Xilong, Huang Qianming. Research on Radiation Source Term Characteristics with Large Fuel Rod Break of PWR Nuclear Power Plant[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2021, 42(S2): 65-69. doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2021.S2.0065
Citation: Jing Futing, Lyu Huanwen, Zhu Jianping, Gao Xilong, Huang Qianming. Research on Radiation Source Term Characteristics with Large Fuel Rod Break of PWR Nuclear Power Plant[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2021, 42(S2): 65-69. doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2021.S2.0065

Research on Radiation Source Term Characteristics with Large Fuel Rod Break of PWR Nuclear Power Plant

doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2021.S2.0065
  • Received Date: 2021-07-19
  • Accepted Date: 2021-12-06
  • Rev Recd Date: 2021-11-13
  • Publish Date: 2021-12-29
  • During the operation of the reactor, the large break of the fuel rod will cause the release of fuel core materials and the obvious rise of the source term in primary coolant circuit, which will affect the safe operation of the reactor. In this paper, the fuel damage status is evaluated based on the measured value of the source term of a nuclear power plant. The analysis shows that there is a large break in the core fuel rod and the release of fuel, which is basically consistent with the damage inspection results after shutdown. Research shows that in the case of a large break in the fuel rod, the source term of the primary coolant circuit has the following characteristics: there is the continuous rise of 134I source term in coolant; the activity spectra of typical fission products are similar to those of contaminated uranium; and there is no obvious iodine peak during power transient; and 239Np source term in coolant could be detected. These laws can be used to analyze the fuel damage of the reactor and help to identify the large fuel rod break in the reactor core.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    李兰,杨洪润. 压水堆核电厂燃料元件破损诊断方法[J]. 核动力工程,2008, 29(4): 135-139.
    [2]
    中国核工业集团公司. CP600压水堆核电厂核燃料管理[M]. 北京: 中国原子能出版传媒有限公司, 2011: 99-100.
    [3]
    范柄辰,吴忠良,屈迪,等. 压水堆核电厂燃料包壳破损的定性分析[J]. 能源与节能,2018(7): 70-72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0802.2018.07.034
    [4]
    CADE. User’s manual: coolant activity data evaluation personal computer program[M]. Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, 1993.
    [5]
    PARRAT D, GENIN J B. Failed rod diagnosis and primary circuit contamination level determination thanks to the DIADEME[J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2002: 265-276.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(5)  / Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (173) PDF downloads(39) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return